For example, if three pipes are in a row, the first might be hydraulicly good, the second could be too small (results in bypass flow down the street), and the third could be hydraulicly good. Why did you choose improvement prioritization as a topic?īased on client feedback from prior projects, a single pipe replacement program is not easy to implement. While this is easy to look at in a singular pipe method, when we converted to a numerical rating system, we were able to overlap both condition and capacity and decide how impactful any singular pipe would be. At the time, they rated their system, using good, fair, poor, or failed. The client wanted the system rated based on condition and capacity. The project was such an interesting study. Why did you select this project for the article? The public works director wanted our help in developing an easy-to-use plan that told them what needed to be replaced and at what level of urgency. It had been built piecemeal over the decades. The system ranged in age from 50-100 years. We interviewed John about the article, asking him about the project and his background with GIS and PCSWMM.Ĭan you tell us about the catalyst for the project?Ī 600-acre site was facing failing infrastructure. It discusses a Kansas municipality’s stormwater study, which analyzed a historic portion of town. Affinis project engineer, John Spell, PE recently wrote an article for APWA’s Reporter magazine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |